Wednesday, February 23, 2005
January 2005 Summary Reports
The January 2005 Sourceforge summary reports have been posted:
Old reports:
- Developer Reports (counts of developers; counts of new developers; list of projects and count of developers, with both October run and January run, for comparison purposes) - big!
- Programming Languages
- Intended Audience
- Operating Systems
- Registration Dates
- Project Status
- Project Topic
- License Types
Old reports:
posted by Megan Squire Conklin @ 10:06 PM
Comments:
<< Home
I wrote a program to count the number of projects that a user was on, from 2004-11 (Nov) to 2008-06 (June).
Two issues:
Issue 1: There were anomalies with the data from 2005-01.
For example, user a-k-i-r-a had 28 projects in 2005-01, but 0 for the other times.
Conversely, user a-ito had 0 projects in 2005-01 and 2 for the other times.
Issue 2: In the 2005-01 file, the first non-comment and non-blank lines are:
a-4 topnerd No specific role 1 2004-10-07 00:00:00
a-4 topnerd No specific role 1 2005-02-14 00:00:00
a-a-p vimboss Project Manager 1 2004-10-07 00:00:00
a-a-p vimboss Project Manager 1 2005-02-14 00:00:00
The file is corrupted; it might be that each user-project-role-admin tuple is repeated twice, once with the date 2004-10-07 00:00:00, and once with the date 2005-02-14 00:00:00.
Do you have an uncorrupted version of the 2005-01 file?
Post a Comment
Two issues:
Issue 1: There were anomalies with the data from 2005-01.
For example, user a-k-i-r-a had 28 projects in 2005-01, but 0 for the other times.
Conversely, user a-ito had 0 projects in 2005-01 and 2 for the other times.
Issue 2: In the 2005-01 file, the first non-comment and non-blank lines are:
a-4 topnerd No specific role 1 2004-10-07 00:00:00
a-4 topnerd No specific role 1 2005-02-14 00:00:00
a-a-p vimboss Project Manager 1 2004-10-07 00:00:00
a-a-p vimboss Project Manager 1 2005-02-14 00:00:00
The file is corrupted; it might be that each user-project-role-admin tuple is repeated twice, once with the date 2004-10-07 00:00:00, and once with the date 2005-02-14 00:00:00.
Do you have an uncorrupted version of the 2005-01 file?
<< Home
